Twitter Growth?

Completely anecdotal but a possible indicator of increased use of Twitter in the last few months?  In September I noted that there had been 300+ tweets tagged with #altc2008 relating to the 3-day 600+ delegate Association of Learning Technologies annual conference.  Today I’m at a 1-day virtual worlds event with about 70 people and so far there seem to be 400+ tweets and rising.  Post on the event will follow on  my work blog.

Oh happy new year! (resolution to blog more often going really well)

Update (Jan 21): Final count for #cevw09 was 600+ which didn’t please everyone.

Tweet from @sleslie

Tweet from @slater

I have to say I found it a bit much too and I was there!  Lots of people saying what the guy in front of me had just said BUT I have really enjoyed following other events… so nicely positioned on the fence!  Be interested to hear what others think…

Reader Comments

  1. Or it could just indicate that those attending a virtual worlds event are more likely to tweet than the general learning technology population that attended ALT.

  2. We ran an event recently at UoL ( which attracted similar criticism, although in our case this was an intensive hour-long session. Twittering allowed remote participants from as far way as Spain to “attend” the session, something which would not have been possible otherwise, and also provided a permanent recorded commentary of the event. OTOH, it is undoubtedly had work keeping up with a simultaneous online and live conversation.

  3. Must admit I find lurking on the edge of an event very useful,
    mostly for BUT it may be sometimes better to have a system as used at handheldlearning last year such so that people can opt into a particular event.
    Its most useful for people having triggered thoughts rather than as a commentary of whats happening.
    Would also help if some events didnt have a tag for every break-out session.

  4. I have enjoyed following a couple of conferences on twitter – and others I have just ignored – don’t see what the problem is.

    Its the people who tweet about their running that is the real problem – only joking and jealous as my knees aren’t up to it these days.

  5. I agree about the benefits of the conference back channel and have found twitter to be an excellent tool in this respect. I wanted to highlight another tool for this purpose ‘Coveritlive’ which is a live blogging tool. I “attended” a session at the recent CETIS conference via the live blogging of Andy Powell. The interaction afforded was more comprehensive than with twitter and I will be encouraging our academics to look at this.

    See for the example that I “attended”

  6. I have mixed feelings about the ‘live-blogging’ phenomenon. Twitter *can* make a good back-channel if used judiciously, but what I sometimes find irritating can be an over-abundance of general background commentary – e.g. ‘so and so is next up to the podium’ etc. I have been guilty of providing this sort of commentary – I recently moaned about how cold it was in the auditorium at one event. And moaning about poor WIFI provision is essential Tweeting of course 😉 But generally, I want succinct pearls of insight from my Twitter network, not general event coverage.

    I especially don’t like Coveritlive for this reason – it encourages dense, real time coverage. There are few, if any occasions, where I want to follow an event this closely without being there….

    I have chatted with Andy Powell about the use of this tool – I accept that others see this very differently to me.

  7. @paul surely from your point of view CoveritLive is better than Twitter, because it is a destination for those interested rather than introducing noise to the Twitterstream etc?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.