A Portal to Media Literacy

Michael Wesch is a Cultural Anthropologist who explores the “impacts of new media on human interaction”.  He’s probably best-known for his Web2.0 in 5-mins YouTube video: The Machine is Us/ing Us It has been viewed around 6-million times and has received 20-thousand user ratings and 7000 comments…  If you’ve not seen it or any of his other short videos then take a look on YouTube.

Last month he gave the following talk entitled A Portal to Media Literacy at a University of Manitoba conference.

It’s just over an hour and well worth finding time to watch the whole thing.  Alternatively, below’s a rough breakdown of what he covers so you can dip in: Continue reading “A Portal to Media Literacy”

Stepping Up a Level

Last week I gave an online presentation with my colleague Hervé Didiot-Cook as part of the Wimba Distinguished Lecture Series (Distinguished = we said yes): Winning with Wimba? From early enthusiasts to the mainstream at a UK University. We were talking about the Wimba Voice Tools which we love but it was a taxing experience as we had several problems with audio, some self-inflicted, others due I think to the Wimba Classroom software which we are less sure about – see Web Conferecing a-go-go by my colleague Kris.

Some of the problems Hervé & I experienced are due to our relative inexperience with these kinds of tools, and this what I mean by stepping up a level. I think for many staff and students it is something of a step up from text-based keyboard & mouse interactions to ones involving audio, headsets, video & webcams as well as host of non-technical stuff. (The lack of visual signals etc). If a learning technologist & a learning technology enthusiast struggle with adapting to this then we know it’s going to be a bigger step for staff & students who are less confident with ICTs.

The week before last I was at Imperial talking to a mixed audience (lecturers, learning technologists & IT staff) about our use of Wimba Classroom & Voice Tools. I made this point about these tools being a step up for many users and although there were a few nods of agreement I think there was a certain amount of scepticism too. I’d be interested to hear what others think.

And finally… Donny Donny Donny (sung to Ruby)! Congratulations to Donny Rovers for playing passing football and stepping up a level on Sunday!

Images: Going Up! Doncaster Rovers 1- 0 Leeds United, 2008 League One playoff Final at Wembley.

Net savvy?

Teenagers using mobiles Last week I finally got round to reading a couple of ‘google generation’ papers from earlier this year: Information behaviour of
the researcher of the future
, PDF (a UCL CIBER Group report for JISC/BL) & Growing up with Google: What it means to education (Oblinger, a Becta report). Together the pair provide both a contrasting view and important similarities. My simplified summary certainly won’t do them justice!

Firstly the contrast, Diana Oblinger highlights a Google generation that are different from previous generations: “have integrated technology into their lives”, “constantly connected”, “demands immediate response”, lots of stuff I’ve heard before. There was only a limited reference to the diversity of technology usage and attitudes of this age group, for example my missing net generation post. The CIBER research was less sure about the neat Google generation label. The report suggests that as well as that age group being quite diverse (20% ‘digital dissidents’) there are many older folk using technologies in a net-gen manner too. One interesting stat for me concerned the user generated content of Wikipedia & YouTube: While it is mainly viewed by 18-24 year-olds; it is mainly produced by 45-54 year-olds and 35-44 year-olds respectively (From: Pew / Internet Typology Report)

Where the two papers came together was Continue reading “Net savvy?”

The Missing Net Generation

Cups of TeaA year or so ago a member of the ‘Net Generation’ told me they knew nothing about blogging. No big deal, this Interweb stuff isn’t everybody’s cup-of-tea. I read a lot about the Net Generation but I also come across a lot of numbers like the ones from previous posts which I’ll repeat here to save you the hassle:

  • 49% UK 8-17 year-olds have a social networking profile (Ofcom, 2008 )
  • 55% of all online US 12-17 year-olds use online social networking sites (Pew Internet, 2007)

What’s interesting to me is the 51% and the 45% who don’t! (Plus note that the US figure is based on “online” teenagers). Do these percentages challenge all the hype about everyone born since 1981 living in MySpace & Bebo? While there’s certainly a whole lot to think about in teaching the net generation, perhaps we should also remember that not everyone is signed up yet!

Image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/olivierclaurent/474306315/

css.php